Contemporary Management of Blunt Splenic Trauma in Adults: An Analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Registry.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of management strategies for blunt splenic injuries in adult patients. METHODS: Patients 18 years and older with blunt splenic injuries registered via the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2013-2019) were identified. Management strategies initiated within 24 hours of hospital presentation were classified as watchful waiting, embolization, surgery, or combination therapy. Patients were stratified by injury grade. Linear models estimated each strategy's effect on hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, and mortality. RESULTS: Of 81,033 included patients, 86.3%, 10.9%, 2.5%, and 0.3% of patients received watchful waiting, surgery, embolization, and combination therapy, respectively. Among patients with low-grade injuries and compared with surgery, embolization was associated with shorter hospital LOS (9.4 days, Q < .001, Cohen's d = .30) and ICU LOS (5.0 days, Q < .001, Cohen's d = .44). Among patients with high-grade injuries and compared with surgery, embolization was associated with shorter hospital LOS (8.7 days, Q < .001, Cohen's d = .12) and ICU LOS (4.5 days, Q < .001, Cohen's d = .23). Among patients with low- and high-grade injuries, the odds ratios for in-hospital mortality associated with surgery compared with embolization were 4.02 (Q < .001) and 4.38 (Q < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients presenting with blunt splenic injuries and compared with surgery, embolization was associated with shorter hospital LOS, shorter ICU LOS, and lower risk for mortality.

Optimizing emergency department imaging utilization for pulmonary emboli: A study on the effects of IV contrast rationing.

PURPOSE: To study the impact of a contrast mitigation protocol on imaging utilization for pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department (ED). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medical records of ED patients with suspected PE who underwent CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) or ventilation-perfusion (VQ) scans were analyzed in control (3/15/22-4/15/22) and test (5/15/22-6/15/22) periods. The test period included a contrast mitigation protocol due to a global iodinated contrast shortage (05/2022-06/2022). Out of 610 scans, 28 were excluded for non-PE indications. Patient demographics, time metrics, and imaging reports were recorded. RESULTS: Among 11,019 ED visits, there were 582 imaging events for suspected PE. The test period exhibited a significantly lower imaging rate of 4.16 % compared to 6.54 % in the control period (p < 0.001). CTPA usage decreased by 47.73 %, while VQ scan usage increased by 775.00 % during the test period. Test period positivity rate was 0.82 %, with CTPA at 0.58 % (1/173) and VQ scan at 1.43 % (1/70). In the control period, the positivity rate was 0.29 %, with CTPA at 0.30 % (1/331) and VQ scan at 0.00 % (0/8). Previous hospitalization history was significantly higher in the test period (70/243 vs. 39/339, p < 0.001). The positivity rates between the two periods showed no significant difference (p = 0.57). There were no significant differences in ED length of stay and image acquisition times. CONCLUSION: The contrast mitigation protocol reduced CTPA use, increased VQ scans, and maintained positivity rates and image acquisition times. However, concerns persist about unnecessary imaging and low positivity rates, necessitating further research to optimize PE diagnostic algorithms.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging After Total Knee Arthroplasty: 2023 Update.

Total knee arthroplasty is the most commonly performed joint replacement procedure in the United States. This manuscript will discuss the recommended imaging modalities for six clinical variants; 1. follow-up of symptomatic or asymptomatic patients with a total knee arthroplasty. Initial imaging, 2. Suspected infection after total knee arthroplasty. Additional imaging following radiographs, 3. Pain after total knee arthroplasty. Infection excluded. Suspect aseptic loosening or osteolysis or instability. Additional imaging following radiographs, 4. Pain after total knee arthroplasty. Suspect periprosthetic or hardware fracture. Additional imaging following radiographs, 5. Pain after total knee arthroplasty. Measuring component rotation. Additional imaging following radiographs, and 6. Pain after total knee arthroplasty. Suspect periprosthetic soft-tissue abnormality unrelated to infection, including quadriceps or patellar tendinopathy. Additional imaging following radiographs. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

The Remote Academic Radiologist: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review.

The importance of developing a robust remote workforce in academic radiology has come to the forefront due to several converging factors. COVID-19, and the abrupt transformation it precipitated in terms of how radiologists worked, has been the biggest impetus for change; concurrent factors such as increasing examination volumes and radiologist burnout have also contributed. How to best advance the most desirable and favorable aspects of remote work while preserving an academic environment that fulfills the tripartite mission is a critical challenge that nearly all academic institutions face today. In this article, we discuss current challenges in academic radiology, including effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, from three perspectives-the radiologist, the learner, and the health system-addressing the following topics: productivity, recruitment, wellness, clinical supervision, mentorship and research, educational engagement, radiologist access, investments in technology, and radiologist value. Throughout, we focus on the opportunities and drawbacks of remote work, to help guide its effective and reliable integration into academic radiology practices.

Are Academic Emergency Radiologists Systematically Disadvantaged Compared With Diagnostic Radiology Subspecialty Counterparts When It Comes to Promotion?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess academic rank differences between academic emergency and other subspecialty diagnostic radiologists. METHODS: Academic radiology departments likely containing emergency radiology divisions were identified by inclusively merging three lists: Doximity's top 20 radiology programs, the top 20 National Institutes of Health-ranked radiology departments, and all departments offering emergency radiology fellowships. Within departments, emergency radiologists (ERs) were identified via website review. Each was then matched on career length and gender to a same-institutional nonemergency diagnostic radiologist. RESULTS: Eleven of 36 institutions had no ERs or insufficient information for analysis. Among 283 emergency radiology faculty members from 25 institutions, 112 career length- and gender-matched pairs were included. Average career length was 16 years, and 23% were women. The mean h indices for ERs and non-ERs were 3.96 ± 5.60 and 12.81 ± 13.55, respectively (P < .0001). Non-ERs were twice as likely as ERs (0.21 versus 0.1) to be associate professors at h index < 5. Men had nearly 3 times the odds of advanced rank compared with women (odds ratio, 2.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-8.26; P = .045). Radiologists with at least one additional degree had nearly 3 times the odds of advancing rank (odds ratio, 2.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-7.40; P = .045). Each additional year of practice increased the odds of advancing rank by 14% (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.21; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Academic ERs are less likely to achieve advanced rank compared with career length- and gender-matched non-ERs, and this persists even after adjusting for h index, suggesting that academic ERs are disadvantaged in current promotions systems. Longer term implications for staffing and pipeline development merit further attention as do parallels to other nonstandard subspecialties such as community radiology.

Radiologist age and diagnostic errors.

PURPOSE: Previous investigations into the causes of error by radiologists have addressed work schedule, volume, shift length, and sub-specialization. Studies regarding possible associations between radiologist errors and radiologist age and timing of residency training are lacking in the literature, to our knowledge. The aim of our study was to determine if radiologist age and residency graduation date is associated with diagnostic errors. METHODS: Our retrospective analysis included 1.9 million preliminary interpretations (out of a total of 5.2 million preliminary and final interpretations) of imaging examinations by 361 radiologists in a US-based national teleradiology practice between 1/1/2019 and 1/1/2020. Quality assurance data regarding the number of radiologist errors was generated through client facility feedback to the teleradiology practice. With input from both the client radiologist and the teleradiologist, the final determination of the presence, absence, and severity of a teleradiologist error was determined by the quality assurance committee of radiologists within the teleradiology company using standardized criteria. Excluded were 3.2 million final examination interpretations and 93,963 (1.8%) of total examinations from facilities reporting less than one discrepancy in examination interpretation in 2019. Logistic regression with covariates radiologist age and residency graduation date was performed for calculation of relative risk of overall error rates and by major imaging modality. Major errors were separated from minor errors as those with a greater likelihood of affecting patient care. Logistic regression with covariates radiologist age, residency graduation date, and log total examinations interpreted was used to calculate odds of making a major error to that of making a minor error. RESULTS: Mean age of the 361 radiologists was 51.1 years, with a mean residency graduation date of 2001. Mean error rate for all examinations was 0.5%. Radiologist age at any residency graduation date was positively associated with major errors (p < 0.05), with a relative risk 1.021 for each 1-year increase in age and relative risk 1.235 for each decade as well as for minor errors (p < 0.05, relative risk 1.007 for each year, relative risk 1.082 for each decade). By major imaging modality, radiologist age at any residency graduation date was positively associated with computed tomography (CT) and X-ray (XR) major and minor error, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) major error, and ultrasound (US) minor error (p < 0.05). Radiologist age was positively associated with odds of making a major vs. minor error (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The mean error rate for all radiologists was low. We observed that increasing age at any residency graduation date was associated with increasing relative risk of major and minor errors as well as increasing odds of a major vs. minor error among providers. Further study is needed to corroborate these results, determine clinical relevance, and highlight strategies to address these findings.

Daytime, evening, and overnight: the 24-h radiology cycle and impact on interpretative accuracy.

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of time of day when a study is interpreted on discrepancy rates for common and advanced studies performed in the acute community setting. METHODS: This retrospective study used the databank of a U.S. teleradiology company to retrieve studies between 2012 and 2016 with a preliminary report followed by a final report by the on-site client hospital. Neuroradiology, abdominal radiology, and musculoskeletal radiology studies were included. Teleradiologists were fellowship trained in one of these subspecialty areas. Daytime, evening, and overnight times were defined. Associations between major and minor discrepancies, time of day, and whether the study was common or advanced were tested with significance set at p = .05. RESULTS: A total of 5,883,980 studies were analyzed. There were 8444 major discrepancies (0.14%) and 17,208 minor discrepancies (0.29%). For common studies, daytime (0.13%) and evening (0.13%) had lower major discrepancy rates compared to overnight (0.14%) (daytime to overnight, RR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.45, 0.72, p < 0.01 and evening to overnight, RR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.49,0.67, p < 0.01). Minor discrepancy rates for common studies were decreased for evening (0.29%) compared to overnight (0.30%) (RR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.80,0.99, p = 0.029). For advanced studies, daytime (.15%) had lower major discrepancy rates compared to evening (0.20%) and overnight (.23%) (daytime to evening, RR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.61, 0.97, p = 0.028 and daytime to overnight, RR = 0.66, 95%CI: 0.50, 0.87, p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSION: Significantly higher major discrepancy rates for studies interpreted overnight suggest the need for radiologists to exercise greater caution when interpreting studies overnight and may require practice management strategies to help optimize overnight work conditions. The lower major discrepancy rates on advanced studies interpreted during the daytime suggest the need for reserving advanced studies for interpretation during the day when possible.

Lessons Learned in Change Management in Deploying Novel Informatics Solutions: Experience Implementing a Point-of-Care Patient Photography System with Radiography.

We describe implementation of a point-of-care system for simultaneous acquisition of patient photographs along with portable radiographs at a large academic hospital. During the implementation process, we observed several technical challenges in the areas of (1) hardware-automatic triggering for photograph acquisition, camera hardware enclosure, networking, and system server hardware and (2) software-post-processing of photographs. Additionally, we also faced cultural challenges involving workflow issues, communication with technologists and users, and system maintenance. We describe our solutions to address these challenges. We anticipate that these experiences will provide useful insights into deploying and iterating new technologies in imaging informatics.

Time ratio disparities among ED patients undergoing head CT.

PURPOSE: To assess if patients who underwent head computed tomography (CT) experienced disparities in the emergency department (ED) and if the indication for head CT affected disparities. METHODS: This study employed a retrospective, IRB-approved cohort design encompassing four hospitals. All ED patients between January 2016 and September 2020 who underwent non-contrast head CTs were included. Furthermore, key time intervals including ED length of stay (LOS), ED assessment time, image acquisition time, and image interpretation time were calculated. Time ratio (TR) was used to compare these time intervals between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 45,177 ED visits comprising 4730 trauma cases, 5475 altered mental status cases, 11,925 cases with head pain, and 23,047 cases with other indications were included. Females had significantly longer ED LOS, ED assessment time, and image acquisition time (TR = 1.012, 1.051, 1.018, respectively, P-value < 0.05). This disparity was more pronounced in female patients with head pain complaints compared to their male counterparts (TR = 1.036, 1.059, and 1.047, respectively, P-value < 0.05). Black patients experienced significantly longer ED LOS, image acquisition time, and image assessment time (TR = 1.226, 1.349, and 1.190, respectively, P-value < 0.05). These disparities persisted regardless of head CT indications. Furthermore, patients with Medicare/Medicaid insurance also faced longer wait times in all the time intervals (TR > 1, P-value < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Wait times for ED head CT completion were longer for Black patients and Medicaid/Medicare insurance holders. Additionally, females experienced extended wait times, particularly when presented with head pain complaints. Our findings underscore the importance of exploring and addressing the contributing factors to ensure equitable and timely access to imaging services in the ED.

Contemporary Management of Blunt Liver Trauma: An Analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Registry (2007-2019).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of management strategies for blunt liver injuries in adult patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with blunt liver injuries registered via the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2007-2019) were identified. Management strategies initiated within 24 hours of hospital presentation were classified as nonoperative management (NOM), embolization, surgery, or combination therapy. Patients were stratified by injury grade. Linear models estimated each strategy's effect on hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, ventilator dependence, and mortality. RESULTS: Of 78,127 included patients, 88.7%, 8.7%, 1.8%, and 0.8% underwent NOM, surgery, embolization, and combination therapy, respectively. Among patients with low-grade (n = 62,237) and high-grade (n = 15,890) injuries and compared with all other management strategies, NOM was associated with the shortest hospital LOS and ICU LOS. Among patients with low-grade injuries and compared with surgery, embolization was associated with a shorter hospital LOS (9.7 days; P < .001; Cohen d = 0.32) and ICU LOS (5.3 days; P < .001; Cohen d = 0.36). Among patients with high-grade injuries and compared with surgery, embolization was associated with a shorter ICU LOS (6.0 days; P < .01; Cohen d = 0.24). Among patients with low- and high-grade injuries and compared with embolization, surgery was associated with higher odds of mortality (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients presenting with blunt liver injuries and compared with surgery, embolization was associated with a shorter ICU LOS and lower risk of mortality.

Are disparities in emergency department imaging exacerbated during high-volume periods?

PURPOSE: Evaluate if disparities in the emergency department (ED) imaging timeline exist, and if disparities are altered during high volume periods which may stress resource availability. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at a four-hospital healthcare system. All patients with at least one ED visit containing imaging from 1/1/2016 to 9/30/2020 were included. Peak hours were defined as ED encounters occurring between 5 pm and midnight, while all other ED encounters were non-peak hours. Patient-flow data points included ED length of stay (LOS), image acquisition time, and diagnostic image assessment time. RESULTS: 321,786 total ED visits consisted of 102,560 during peak hours and 219,226 during non-peak hours. Black patients experienced longer image acquisition and image assessment times across both time periods (TR = 1.030; p < 0.001 and TR = 1.112; p < 0.001, respectively); Black patients also had increased length of stay compared to White patients, which was amplified during peak hours. Likewise, patients with primary payer insurance experienced significantly longer image acquisition and image assessment times in both periods (TR > 1.00; p < 0.05 for all). Females had longer image acquisition and image assessment time and the difference was more pronounced in image acquisition time during both peak and non-peak hours (TR = 1.146 and TR = 1.139 respectively with p < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSION: When measuring radiology time periods, patient flow throughout the ED was not uniform. There was unequal acceleration and deceleration of patient flow based on racial, gender, age, and insurance status. Segmentation of patient flow time periods may allow identification of causes of inequity such that disparities can be addressed with targeted actions.

Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Education in Radiology: Multi-institutional Survey of Radiology Residents in the United States.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate radiology residents' perspectives regarding inclusion of artificial intelligence/ machine learning (AI/ML) education in the residency curriculum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online anonymous survey was sent to 759 residents at 21 US radiology residency programs. Resident demographics, sub-specialty interests, educational background and research experiences, as well as the awareness, availability, and usefulness of various resources for AI/ML education were collected. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 27% (209/759). A total of 74% of respondents were male, 80% were training at large university programs, and only a minority (<20) had formal education or research experience in AI/ML. All four years of training were represented (range: 20%-38%). The majority of the residents agreed or strongly agreed (83%) that AI/ML education should be a part of the radiology residency curriculum and that such education should equip them with the knowledge to troubleshoot an AI tool in practice / determine whether a tool is working as intended (82%). Among the residency programs that offer AI/ML education, the most common resources were lecture series (43%), national informatics courses (28%), and in-house/institutional courses (26%). About 24% of the residents reported no AI/ML educational offerings in their residency curriculum. Hands on AI/ML laboratory (67%) and lecture series (61%) were reported as the most beneficial or effective. The majority of the residents preferred AI/ML education offered as a continuous course spanning the radiology residency (R1 to R4) (76%), followed by mini fellowship during R4 (32%) and as a course during PGY1 (21%). CONCLUSION: Residents largely favor the inclusion of formal AI/ML education in the radiology residency curriculum, prefer hands-on learning and lectures as learning tools, and prefer a continuous AI/ML course spanning R1-R4.

Utilizing a combined hospital and criminal justice database to identify risk factors for repeat firearm injury or violent-crime arrest among firearm victims.

Introduction: Identifying firearm victims with the greatest risk of repeat-firearm exposure and offering interventions has the potential to disrupt recurrent violence. This study explored risk factors associated with repeat violence among survivors of intentional firearm injury in a unique clinical and criminal justice (CJ) dataset. Methods: This study analyzed a retrospective cohort (n = 4058) of persons injured by nonfatal intentional firearm violence from 2013 to 2016 in one metropolitan area. Data were collected from a single level I trauma center, city police records, and state CJ databases from 1948 to 2019. The primary outcome of interest was another firearm injury or violent-crime arrest (defined as a violent or firearm felony offense). Results: Among 4058 nonfatal intentional firearm victims, 1202 (29.6%) individuals had a repeat-firearm injury or violent-crime arrest. In a bivariate analysis, history of mental, physical, and/or emotional abuse (odds ratio [OR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-1.86), mental health diagnosis (OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.51-2.35), or illegal substance use (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 2.48-3.32) was associated with increased risk of repeat-firearm injury or violent-crime arrest. Prior felony arrest (OR, 3.68; 95% CI, 3.19-4.24), prior incarceration (OR, 3.72; 95% CI, 3.04-4.56), prior firearm charge (OR, 4.06; 95% CI, 3.33-4.96), and suspected gang membership (OR, 8.69; 95% CI, 6.14-12.32) demonstrated the greatest association with significant repeat violence. Conclusions: Thirty percent of those who experienced an intentional firearm injury were found to have a repeat-firearm injury or violent-crime arrest multi-disciplinary interventions that address the complex needs of a CJ-involved population are needed to mitigate significant repeat violence.

Utilization of Chest and Abdominopelvic CT for Traumatic Injury From 2011 to 2018: Evaluation Using a National Commercial Database.

BACKGROUND. Increases in the use of CT to evaluate patients presenting with trauma have raised concern about inappropriate imaging. The evolving utilization of CT for trauma evaluation may be impacted by injury severity. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to explore patterns in utilization of chest and abdominopelvic CT among trauma-related emergency department (ED) visits across the United States. METHODS. This retrospective study was conducted with national commercial claims information extracted from the MarketScan Commercial Database. Trauma-related ED encounters were identified from the 2011-2018 MarketScan database files and classified by injury severity score (minor, intermediate, and major injuries) on the basis of International Classification of Diseases codes. ED encounters were also assessed for chest CT, abdominopelvic CT, and single-encounter chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations. Utilization per 1000 trauma-related ED encounters was determined. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to determine incidence rate ratios (IRRs) as a measure of temporal changes in utilization. RESULTS. From 2011 to 2018, 8,369,092 trauma-related ED encounters were identified (5,685,295 for minor, 2,624,944 for intermediate, and 58,853 for major injuries). Utilization of chest CT per 1000 trauma-related ED encounters increased from 4.9 to 13.5 examinations (adjusted IRR, 1.15 per year; minor injuries, from 2.2 to 7.7 [adjusted IRR, 1.17]; intermediate injuries, from 8.5 to 21.5 [adjusted IRR, 1.16]; major injuries, from 117.8 to 200.1 [adjusted IRR, 1.08]). Utilization of abdominopelvic CT per 1000 trauma-related ED encounters increased from 7.5 to 16.4 (adjusted IRR, 1.12; minor injuries, 4.8 to 12.2 [adjusted IRR, 1.13]; intermediate injuries, 10.6 to 21.7 [adjusted IRR, 1.13]; major injuries, 134.8 to 192.6 [adjusted IRR, 1.07]). Utilization of single-encounter chest and abdominopelvic CT per 1000 trauma-related ED encounters increased from 3.4 to 8.9 [adjusted IRR, 1.16; minor injuries, 1.1 to 4.6 [adjusted IRR, 1.18]; intermediate injuries, 6.4 to 16.4 [adjusted IRR, 1.16]; major injuries, 99.6 to 179.9 [adjusted IRR, 1.08]). CONCLUSION. National utilization of chest and abdominopelvic CT for trauma-related ED encounters increased among commercially insured patients from 2011 to 2018, particularly for single-encounter chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations and for minor injuries. CLINICAL IMPACT. Given concerns about increased cost and detection of incidental findings, further investigation is warranted to explore the potential benefit of single-encounter chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations of patients with minor injuries and to develop strategies for optimizing appropriateness of imaging orders.

Imaging of Soft Tissue Infections.

Although superficial infections can often be diagnosed and managed clinically, physical examination may lack sensitivity and specificity, and imaging is often required to evaluate the depth of involvement and identify complications. Depending on the area of involvement, radiography, ultrasound, CT, MR imaging, or a combination of imaging modalities may be required. Soft tissue infections can be nonnecrotizing or necrotizing, with the later having a morbid and rapid course. Infectious tenosynovitis most commonly affects the flexor tendon sheaths of the hand, characterized by thickened and enhancing synovium with fluid-filled tendon sheaths.

Comparative effectiveness of pelvic arterial embolization versus laparotomy in adults with pelvic injuries: A National Trauma Data Bank analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes and trends of arterial embolization (AE) versus laparotomy which are used in the management of pelvic trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients with pelvic injuries were identified using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2007 to 2015. Patients with non-pelvic life-threatening injuries were excluded. Patients were grouped in operatively managed pelvic ring injuries, laparotomy ± fixation, AE ± fixation, and laparotomy and AE ± fixation. Using a linear mixed regression and logistic regression models, hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU days, ventilator days, and mortality for different therapies were compared. A propensity score weighting method was used to further eliminate treatment selection bias in the study sample and compare the outcomes between AE and laparotomy. RESULTS: Of 7473 pelvic trauma patients, 1226 (16.4%) patients were only operatively managed. 3730 patients (49.9%) underwent laparotomy, 2136 underwent AE (28.6%), and 381 (5.1%) patients underwent both laparotomy and AE. The year of injury, patient age, gender, race, severity of injury and presence of shock were found to be predictors of receipt of different therapies (P < 0.001 for all). When correcting for these confounding factors, the mortality rate was lower in the AE group compared to the laparotomy group 6.6% vs. 20.6% (P < 0.001). Additionally, LOS and ICU days were shorter for the AE group than the laparotomy group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: AE in patients with pelvic injuries is associated with lower mortality, as well as shorter LOS and ICU stays compared to laparotomy.

Interpretations of Examinations Outside of Radiologists' Fellowship Training: Assessment of Discrepancy Rates Among 5.9 Million Examinations From a National Teleradiology Databank.

BACKGROUND. In community settings, radiologists commonly function as multispecialty radiologists, interpreting examinations outside of their area of fellowship training. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to compare discrepancy rates for preliminary interpretations of acute community-setting examinations that are concordant versus discordant with interpreting radiologists' area of fellowship training. METHODS. This retrospective study used the databank of a U.S. teleradiology company that provides preliminary interpretations for client community hospitals. The analysis included 5,883,980 acute examinations performed from 2012 to 2016 that were preliminarily interpreted by 269 teleradiologists with a fellowship of neuroradiology, abdominal radiology, or musculoskeletal radiology. When providing final interpretations, client on-site radiologists voluntarily submitted quality assurance (QA) requests if preliminary and final interpretations were discrepant; the teleradiology company's QA committee categorized discrepancies as major (n = 8444) or minor (n = 17,208). Associations among examination type (common vs advanced), relationship between examination subspecialty and the teleradiologist's fellowship (concordant vs discordant), and major and minor discrepancies were assessed using three-way conditional analyses with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS. For examinations with a concordant subspecialty, the major discrepancy rate was lower for common than for advanced examinations (0.13% vs 0.26%; relative risk [RR], 0.50, 95% CI, 0.42-0.60; p < .001). For examinations with a discordant subspecialty, the major discrepancy rate was lower for common than advanced examinations (0.14% vs 0.18%; RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.90; p < .001). For common examinations, the major discrepancy rate was not different between examinations with concordant versus discordant subspecialty (0.13% vs 0.14%; RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81-1.01; p = .07). For advanced examinations, the major discrepancy rate was higher for examinations with concordant versus discordant subspecialty (0.26% vs 0.18%; RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.18-1.79; p < .001). The minor discrepancy rate was higher among advanced examinations for those with concordant versus discordant subspecialty (0.34% vs 0.29%; RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.00-1.36; p = .04), but not different for other comparisons (p > .05). CONCLUSION. Major and minor discrepancy rates were not higher for acute community-setting examinations outside of interpreting radiologists' fellowship training. Discrepancy rates increased for advanced examinations. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings support multispecialty radiologist practice in acute community settings. Efforts to match examination and interpreting radiologist sub-specialty may not reduce diagnostic discrepancies.

Increasing Utilization of Emergency Department Neuroimaging From 2007 Through 2017.

BACKGROUND. The volume of emergency department (ED) visits and the number of neuroimaging examinations have increased since the start of the century. Little is known about this growth in the commercially insured and Medicare Advantage populations. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate changing ED utilization of neuroimaging from 2007 through 2017 in both commercially insured and Medicare Advantage enrollees. METHODS. Using patient-level claims from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart database, which annually includes approximately 12-14 million commercial and Medicare Advantage health plan enrollees, annual ED utilization rates of head CT, head MRI, head CTA, neck CTA, head MRA, neck MRA, and carotid duplex ultrasound (US) were assessed from 2007 through 2017. To account for an aging sample population, utilization rates were adjusted using annual relative proportions of age groups and stratified by patient demographics, payer type, and provider state. RESULTS. Between 2007 and 2017, age-adjusted ED neuroimaging utilization rates per 1000 ED visits increased 72% overall (compound annual growth rate [CAGR], 5%). This overall increase corresponded to an increase of 69% for head CT (CAGR, 5%), 67% for head MRI (CAGR, 5%), 1100% for head CTA (CAGR, 25%), 1300% for neck CTA (CAGR, 27%), 36% for head MRA (CAGR, 3%), and 52% for neck MRA (CAGR, 4%) and to a decrease of 8% for carotid duplex US (CAGR, -1%). The utilization of head CT and CTA of the head and neck per 1000 ED visits increased in enrollees 65 years old or older by 48% (CAGR, 4%) and 1011% (CAGR, 24%). CONCLUSION. Neuroimaging utilization in the ED grew considerably between 2007 and 2017, with growth of head and neck CTA far outpacing the growth of other modalities. Unenhanced head CT remains by far the dominant ED neuroimaging examination. CLINICAL IMPACT. The rapid growth of head and neck CTA observed in the fee-for-service Medicare population is also observed in the commercially insured and Medicare Advantage populations. The appropriateness of this growth should be monitored as the indications for CTA expand.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Nontraumatic Chest Wall Pain.

Chest pain is a common reason that patients may present for evaluation in both ambulatory and emergency department settings, and is often of musculoskeletal origin in the former. Chest wall syndrome collectively describes the various entities that can contribute to chest wall pain of musculoskeletal origin and may affect any chest wall structure. Various imaging modalities may be employed for the diagnosis of nontraumatic chest wall conditions, each with variable utility depending on the clinical scenario. We review the evidence for or against use of various imaging modalities for the diagnosis of nontraumatic chest wall pain. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.